![]() |
|||
|
|||
|
Active forum topics
Who's online
There are currently 0 users and 27 guests online.
|
Changing Workforce Development in Ohio
Categories:
One of the mysteries of the economy is the growing disconnect between unemployed or under-employed workers and growing companies that are desperate for the talent they need to succeed. This "skilled worker shortage" prompted the creation of two web sites last year in Northeast Ohio that highlight the region's available jobs in the manufacturing sector -- www.jobmagnet.org -- and in the bioscience and tech sectors -- www.neotechjobs.org. Both sites are designed to increase public awareness of available positions. Employers throughout Ohio have long complained that there is a disconnect between the way the state prepares workers for jobs and the jobs that are available. Last week, Gov. Strickland tried to close that gap by shifting around some key elements of the state 's bureaucracy. This is how Plain Dealer reporter Tom Breckenridge described the shift in a recent story:
You can read more about the changes on Gov. Strickland's web site. |
Northeast Ohio Poll
What You're Saying
|
||
|
Comments
There is a lot of hope that Ohioians can qualify to fill the types of jobs being created here. It is said that many jobs go unfilled because of the lack of skilled people. Technology itself creates its own problems. Like when armies of draftspersons are replaced by engineers doing their own CAD work. Any time you computerize or automate a process, you eliminate a whole group of people. Now you have this group scrambling to find other work. So in retraining there is a need to know what skills are transferable and valued by other fields of endeavor. Also you must consider if these new jobs require more than what is reasonable retraining. So far nobody has said what these hot new fields are or how folks can be retrained to take those jobs. It is not just a matter of shifting a worker to a new product line in another factory. I think we've talked before about skill sets. Some how you've got to look at what you have available and compare that to what you want. Then if schools can't stand in the training transition gap, businesses must step up to join the training effort. These should shape the training, provide career guidance, internships, scholarships or what ever investment in real people. If you are going to do economic battle, you must do it all the way. You can't rely on market forces to accomplish the job that requires assertive action. I really hope the governor's efforts paysoff big for Ohio.
Jobmagnet.org and Neotechjobs.org look like great resources. I realize they only recently came online. But do you know if any information is available yet on outcomes--e.g., number of placements, industries/occupations demonstrating higher success rates than others, usage statistics, etc.? I'd be interested to know how these new resources are performing versus traditional resources like Monster.com.
Brian,
Thanks for the post. I will inquire with both MAGNET and NorTech to see what kind of results they've been able to track from their job sites. It's a good question. Chris
That's great. Thanks, Chris.
Since its inception in July 2007, over 5,500 job seekers and over 400 employers have registered at www.jobmagnet.org. To date, employers have conducted over 5,000 resume searches and directly posted approximately 550 unique open positions (this does not include the thousands of positions aggregated through our spider technology which pulls open manufacturing positions posted on the web from manufacturing companies, recruiters, etc.). During that same time period, job seekers have conducted more than 28,000 job searches on www.jobmagnet.org and successfully found employment at companies including: Atlantic Tool & Die, Avtron Manufacturing, Cleveland Motion Controls, Honeywell, Mill and Motion, Inc., NSL Analytical, Rockwell Automation, Ruether Mold and Swanton Welding. Our software platform does not have a tracking system by where it can record successful matches. A voluntary survey is the only way at this time to gauge direct matches. Since the launch of the portal, usage has continued to increase both from the employer and job seeker side, reinforcing the need from both the supply and demand side of the manufacturing workforce equation. We believe that www.jobmagnet.org has helped both audiences and will continue to do so in the future.
www.neotechjobs.com is an internet career networking resource focused on connecting high tech talent to Northeast Ohio organizations. Since its launch in April 2007, more than 2,800 job seekers and 290 employers have registered at www.neotechjobs.com. To date, these employers conducted 2,200 resume searches and posted more than 300 well-paying, local area jobs. During that same time period, job seekers conducted more than 17,000 job searches on www.neotechjobs.com and found employment with the region’s leading employers such as the Cleveland Clinic, General Electric, NASA Glenn Research Center, Bendix, American Greetings, and with local small and mid-size high tech enterprises. Neotechjobs.com does not have a tracking system to record successful matches but utilizes a voluntary follow up survey sent to jobs seekers asking if they have found employment. This is currently our only method to track direct matches. Neotechjobs.com continues to see an increase in traffic from job seekers and employers in Northeast Ohio, as well as out of state job seekers. Neotechjobs and Jobmagnet sites have succeeded in raising awareness of the demand for high tech and skilled manufacturing jobs in Northeast Ohio. We are hopeful community, business, academic and state leaders will engage in this issue to develop solutions to address the region’s and state’s high tech talent and workforce issues. Recent High Tech Jobs Data: Regular Labor Market Intelligence reports monitor the availability and types of high tech jobs in Northeast Ohio as posted by employers, recruiters, etc. on the web. In the first quarter of this year, nearly 5,400 high technology jobs were posted by 580 Northeast Ohio employers. The IT and healthcare sectors continue to account for the majority of high tech jobs (84%) available in the Northeast Ohio region. IT listings made up 40% of the jobs and the health care sector accounted for 44%.
This is great the Governer Strickland wants to add money for this, but letting the Ohio Department of Job and Family services control it? I am a bit skeptical about this, as their idea of getting people off the welfare rolls is to ship them to a facility, working with mentally handicapped citizens, while being overseen by an instructor, and told to do menial piecework jobs, all to recieve their benefits, which usually doesn't add up to even minimum wage. All the time living in fear the instructor will find some stupid reason to sanction them, and cut their benefits for many times pointless reasons. One woman once told me she was sanctioned because she had a medically confirmed bladder infection, and needed to use the restroom a lot. This program also does not allow for families to take care of themselves. When told that you HAVE to participate in the jobs program, you are told when they will be coming to pick you up, regardless if you have any way to take care of your children or not, and usually they come to pick you up about an hour and a half before school starts. Speaking of picking up, that is another interesting point. You are not allowed to drive to the job site at all. No matter where you live in the county, they come to your house, take you all the way to ODJFS, then take you to the job site, (which is back in the town I live in, about a 1/2 hr drive from the agency) Then after you are done, they drive you back to ODJFS, and then take you back home. I wonder what their fuel budget is? It must be nice to have tax payers to pay for so much gas for you! The ODJFS does such a poor job of actually helping people as it is now, that I wonder about handing them this opportunity. You go there, they treat you like a number, hand you whatever benefits you qualify for, and ship you off to job school. I returned to college, after 12 years of being out of high school, because I was told that I would have help, so that I could advance, and better my life, but once I started school, I was met with opposition at every step of the way, I had to fight through two years of schooling with none of the promised help. They also crow about Ohio apprenticeship programs, telling you how great they are, but they never know anything about them, or how to actually help anyone get into one. You can find information about them all over the web, but try to get into one, and see what you find. I don't feel these people are the best candidates for allocating these funds, or for trying to help people. This agency is only interested in giving out the bare minimum, and keeping everyone right in the poverty rut they are in. If they actually wanted to help you I think they would be more proactive in helping people get skills to get jobs that pay a living wage, instead of punishing people, and presiding over them every step of the way. I would actually like to request this letter to be forwarded to Governer Strickland, if he is thinking of giving these funds to this agency. I would like him to see it might be a mistake, and tell him he is free to contact me if he has any questions. I have a lot of inside information on this agency, and believe me going through it is hell.
Sincerely,
Danni Blake
Danni,
My understanding is the Department of Development and the Chancellor would take the lead in talent and workforce issues, not the Department of Jobs and Family Services. It is important that the state make the changes needed to assure workforce development efforts both meet the needs of employers and provide the skills workers need.
Noelle P
The growing discussions about the high unemployment rate and the large number of positions to be filled should send off a louder alarm about the way we are educating ourselves and others. Technology is never going to stop progressing so instead of fearing it, we need to develop ways to continue to provide employment opportunities to collaborate with the growing technology (for example, IT specialists).
I agree with Arnold when he said that businesses should pick up the slack with educating workers. While it does take more money for education and training, it's only going to help companies in the long run. The alternative is to let potentially productive workers slip through their hands.
Educators are dropping the ball because they are more concerned with students passing standardized tests instead of being "employable for life." The question is where to start. Do we go to high schools or colleges and vocational schools? Where did we lose our value of education and how to we get it back? These programs are a start.
Georgia Reash
Cleveland is long overdue for stimulus between employers and education; even though we have known for at least ten years that children lacked the critical and creative thinking upon entry into the workforce.
Both industry and education have responsibility; businesses need to see themselves as partners in community (and the education system) and education needs to take a longer term view of what they are producing (students as future citizens).
However - the bigger challenge is the State leaders in education and workforce development: How do we move this from being a good idea to BEING A NORM?
Given the No Child Left Behind accountability demands that leave teachers and school leaders burdened, and their growing financial pressures, schools must have supported rationale for shifting their OPERATIONAL PARADIGM to one that is ROOTED in community relationship.
We must, essentially, change the whole pedagogy of education to one rooted in community partnership.
And systemic pedagogy is only changed by pressure (mandates) and reward (financial recognition).
If we really want to create this essential linkage between workforce and education, we must take the steps that create is as a CULTURAL and OPERATIONAL VALUE.
This is deep systems change, starting at the state and landing in your own back yard.
It CAN be done, though. More importantly, our current educational system and quality of workforce personnel demand that it must be done.