| |||
|
|||
|
|
Active forum topics
Who's online
There are currently 0 users and 29 guests online.
|
Building the Pittsburgh-Cleveland Tech Belt
Categories:
Reps. Tim Ryan (D-Niles) and Jason Altmire (D-Aliquippa) today hosted about 100 hundred civic, government and business leaders from Northeast Ohio and Southwest Pennsylvania to discuss increasing economic connections among the two regions. The Youngstown Vindicator's coverage of the meeting can be found here and the ABJ's coverage is here. The point of the session was to emphasize that the state border is an artificial boundary that shouldn't keep our two communities from collaborating to spur economic development. They dubbed the region between Pittsburgh and Cleveland as the "Tech Belt." Rep. Ryan was eloquent in his call for shared approach to economic development. "We can create an economic unit able to compete with Shanghai and Mumbai," he said. To do so, the region will have to put aside old notions of borders and limitations and "collectively build a vision of what could be." He called on the leaders in the room to push through the many challenges they will face from those who question the value of cross-state collaboration. "Criticism is the precursor of progress," he said. "Leadership is the lubricant of success," he said "Each of us must be willing to lead." Rep. Altmire said a future meeting would be held in Pittsburgh and other efforts would be pushed to increase cross-border collaborations. "We want to break the border open," he said. The border between the region's bioscience industries has already been torn down. BioEnterprise of Cleveland and the Life Sciences Greenhouse have been collaborating for more than a year. Companies in both states are finding assets that help them succeed across the border, according to Baiju Shah, president of BioEnterprise. And John Manzetti, president of Life Sciences Greenhouse, said that venture capitalists are impressed by the portfolio of companies that the region has to offer and are more inclined to visit the region. "The numbers are pretty compelling," he said. The bioscience partnership is just the beginning of greater collaboration among Cleveland and Pittsburgh organizations. The strengths of the two regions -- united as one -- can indeed create a global powerhouse. But as Rep. Ryan pointed out, it will take great leadership and a rejection of old practices. Today's program was a great start. Trackback URL for this post:http://www.advancenortheastohio.org/trackback/212
|
Northeast Ohio Poll
What You're Saying
Tag Cloud
Blogroll
Brewed Fresh Daily |
||
|
Comments
Building a tech belt: Well there is talk of Cleveland State University and Akron U. joining forces. There is a Universities collaborative tech link through the Wright Center for Sensor Systems Engineering at Cleveland State University. The WCSSE effect is of the High Tech Corridor that spreads from Cleveland, through Columbus and on to Cincinnati.
I agree collaboration is the key for Cleveland and Pittsburg. Competition is irrelevant on the local level when collaborations can bring complement and strength to competing globally. The “my back yard mentality,” only serves to cut us off from the needed growth and prosperity.
I’ll go one better. To have collaborations, a sound economy, and to be more environmentally and socially responsible we need ACCESS –to wean ourselves from some of the fuel dependency and yet get the job done while serving our masses. To do this we need to look at Europe and the TGV type of systems. These trains are moving greater populous at speeds of 200 miles per hour and can go up to approximately 300 miles per hour. Paris France charges drivers a fee and thus induces alternatives. Their transit system is quite extensive, and they have a bike rental system with drop offs with no fee paid for the short trips.
In my village of New London, Ohio we have a ZENN dealer. This is a small all eclectic vehicle that I would be happy to use for short hops to a decent mass transit. It would be my future plan to charge my electric vehicle via photovoltaic. Change can be a hard thing when people don’t see the time to transition.
A story of motivation:
A certain species of frog gets comfortable in whatever environment it is in. The frog is sitting in a pan of water at room temperature. The heat is gradually turned up. But the frog never jumps out, and it slowly boils to death. Do not let yourself get too comfortable; if there are changes in the environment, you need to react.
Access will better serve collaborations, our mobile society, the health of our economy and the environment.
To that end we ought to get moving on creating a rail corridor from Cleveland to Pittsburgh. Being able to work on a train brings the cost of traveling down. And face-to-face collaboration is particularly effective.
Generally I agree with this sort of movement. Howver, first in my mind is this nagging question, "What changed?" There have always been places off shore where labor costs were less than domestic rates.
20 to 30 years or so ago something changed. It became more attractive to buy U. S. manufacturer, move the production off-shore, let the U.S. plant and facilities rust and rot, import the off-shore manufactured products and do all this at a profit! What changed to makke this happen? Was it Congressional action? Federal level Executive actions? What changed?
Before public funds are spent on more education, transportation, infrastructure and facitlities the events that permitted this exodus to off-shore production needs to be reversed. It makes no sense to spend publuc funds on technologies, product development and facitlites only nto see the fruits of these efforts be outsourced. Embracing g'globalism' is like having a pick-pocket put the grip on your house key, copy it, use the copy and the expect you to be thankful that the original was returned to you...and your empty house.
We need to support political leaders who make real changes. We need legislators at the stqte and federal level who are for Northeat Ohio first and formost. Political leaders who actually make changes. Their failure cannot be an option...nnot be ignored or forgiven.
As this is boing done we will have a more solid basis for the development that we all expect to see.